Sometimes, vampires truly do suck...and not in the good way
[Note: The lovely and talented Maria Lima is the Femmes' guest blogger this month. An Agatha-nominated writer, Maria specializes in the things not of this world and particularly the undead. Her supernatural mystery, Matters of the Blood (Juno, 2007) takes place deep in the heart of Texas and features Keira Kelly, a heroine with more-than-usually troublesome neighbor and family problems about to realize her own awesome powers. Keira will be back in Blood Bargain in November. Don't forget to say hey to Maria when you're at Malice Domestic in a couple of weeks; in the meantime, check out her blog. Maria, take it away! ]
Sometimes, vampires truly do suck...and not in the good way.
I mean, take writing them. You go along, line by line, chapter by chapter and then, all of a sudden, the sucker (pun intended) won't *do* what you wanted him to do. That goes for all types of characters as well.
Now, I do realize that characters really don't have a life of their own and that's it mainly my subconscious trying to make me realize that I'm about to go down the wrong writing road (because if I really thought that Keira Kelly or Adam Walker or Tucker or any of my characters were whispering in my ear, that's when they'd come to take me to the asylum to be a roomie for Renfield, and I'm so not going there).
What I'm really talking about is the little voice inside that nudges you when the book you're working on is branching off into boring land, or maybe just repetition road. I know. I've just been there, done that. About seven eighths of the way to a finished draft of my upcoming book, Blood Bargain, I decided to make a huge concerted effort to finishing the the draft in a week. Not so bad, a couple of thousand words a night, every night for six nights. I could do this. Part of my angst involves my day job, a fairly demanding position which was about to become even more demanding after losing two of my peers due to life moves (basically, cutting the project management staff in half). I knew that in order to make sure Blood Bargain had even a remote chance of getting done and getting turned in, I'd have to knuckle down and write more than usual.
I went along, first night, about 1500 words, second night, 3000, third night, 1700. As I wrote, I polished, trimmed, sorted and resorted actions and sections to make more sense in the narrative flow. I cut out part of the prologue, move most of the rest of it to within the body of the book, making it more dynamic. (Thank goodness for Scrivener, which lets you do this with relative ease. I've fought a long hard battle with Microsoft Word, and it lost, but that's a tale for another day). I expanded one scene, trimmed another, made sure that my timeline made sense. I was doing great. I felt a wonderful sense of accomplishment, basking in the euphoria that happens when you're in the writing zone and you know it.
The euphoria lasted three nights.
On night four, I got home loaded for bear and ready to attack. I just knew that I could do at least 2000 words tonight, maybe even more. I sat down, opened up Scrivener and reviewed the last couple of chapters I'd written. In less than fifteen minutes, I realized that there was a totally extraneous chapter where nothing happened. I don't know why it took so long to realize. This was a chapter that had been written eons ago, long before I'd actually gotten to this point in the overall narrative. It was one of those scenes that I'd conjured up so very clearly. In fact, I could visualize just about everything, including the lighting, the sounds, the smells. Oh yeah, baby, this was golden!
Only thing is, I also knew that I'd had trouble with this chapter for a long time, but kept thinking it was the lead in from the previous chapter that was the problem. A couple of my beta readers had even remarked on the abruptness of introducing this scene. I could fix that, no problem. Just make sure to write a scene before it that gets my characters here.
Except..not so much. Turns out, it was a problem because simply, the scene existed. It wasn't the writing. The words were good. The dialogue was good. It's just that absolutely nothing happened. Without giving away the plot (a crucial part at this point), my protagonist, Keira, finds something out about Adam, who is her lover and the chief of the local vampire tribe. In the original version, Keira's at her house, with her brother, telling him why she's not at Adam's, when they get a call and rush over to Adam's ranch to find out that [insert spoiler here that I won't give away]. It was about 2500 words of Keira saying & thinking: "I'm at my house, being all angsty and oh, is that the phone?"
What's wrong with this picture? There was absolutely no reason for the entire scene at Keira's house. None. Nada. Rien.
After going through the five stages of writing grief: Denial (No, I can't cut it. It's a good chapter); Anger (Damn it! I just wasted all that time!); Bargaining (Well, maybe if I just tweak it a little...); Depression (Sigh. That means I'm 2500 words further away from "the end"); Acceptance (Cut, paste into a separate file for posterity, rework the discovery of [insert spoiler here] where Keira is at Adam's house), I realized that the lessons I've learned from hanging out with writers over the years are very, very true and that ignoring them will just lead to bad writing.
(1) Writing is not for sissies.
(2) Show, not tell.
(3) Sometimes, you have to kill the puppies.*
(4) When in doubt, cut it out.
Oh yeah, and vampires really do suck...but mostly in very good ways.
* Killing the puppies = deleting a well-written scene because it doesn't advance the plot.
::nodnodnod:: Oh, yeah, I hear you! Cutting wonderful scenes hurts, but (as Peter said to Harriet), if it makes a better book, does the pain matter? ::g::
Posted by: Carla | April 14, 2008 at 05:29 AM
Hey, Maria,
Great post. (And thanks to Dana for mentioning it on a list we're both on . . .)
I just sent out my little newsletter to readers and included a scene I adored from SOCORRO. Only, it never made the final book. It's a great piece of writing but had nothing to do with anything important in the novel.
So, sometimes you don't have to shoot your babies as much as put them in day care.
Posted by: Pari Noskin Taichert | April 14, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Hah! I like the concept of putting the puppies in day care instead of shooting them...
Excellent post!
Posted by: zhadi | April 16, 2008 at 07:13 PM
The idea of recycling an idea that doesn't work is small comfort when you have to cut a scene you adored. BUT...the feeling of using it (and making it an even better scene) in a book where it belongs is satisfying in the extreme.
Thrift, Horatio, thrift.
Keep fighting the good fight, M!
Posted by: Dana Cameron | April 17, 2008 at 07:31 AM