By Elaine Viets of the Femmes Fatales.
Is it just me, or do mysteries seem to be getting longer?
When I started writing mysteries, most contracts called for novels between 70,000 and 90,000 words. That's still standard contract language, and those books will run about 300 to 350 pages.
But others have morphed into 120,000 – or 150,000 words – or more.
Don't get me wrong. I love to wallow in a fat, 500-page John Grisham legal thriller, or vanish into a 700-page Harry Potter novel.
The overdone novels I'm talking about have padded plots and tiresome twists: Yes, he did it – no wait, he didn't – hold it, looks like she was the killer – actually the butler did it – until I simply don't care any more. Just end it, okay?
Many classic novels are much shorter than some of today's overblown tomes.
Robert Bloch made us shiver at the thought of a family motel in Psycho's slender 176 pages. Mickey Spillane's I, the Jury, written in 1947 has withstood the judgement of time, and it's only 177 pages.
Ian Fleming's immortal James Bond captured our attention in 188 pages of Casino Royale. (And if you haven't read Bond in book form, you're missing a treat. He's way better than the cartoon character in many of the Bond movies.)
Which do you prefer, readers – longer novels, or shorter ones? Tell us your favorites.
88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
Looking for a quick read? Ice Blonde, my 5-star forensic novella, is only 164 pages.
https://www.amazon.com/Blonde-Angela-Richman-Death-Investigator/dp/1625673620/ref=sr_1_1_twi_pap_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1549489322&sr=8-1&keywords=Ice+Blonde+and+Elaine+Viets
I don't think any of Agatha Christie's novels were more than 60,000 words; most of the Golden Age mysteries, in fact, seem to run around 180-200 pages max. When I bought the latest Galbraith for my Kindle, I wasn't aware until I saw it in a bookstore that it was 670-some pages. No wonder it was such a slog.
Posted by: Marcia Talley | February 07, 2019 at 06:03 AM
About 350 is my sweet spot, I'd say. Every once in a while Ill pick up an epic that's longer but for my day-to-day reading, which is almost always a mystery, I prefer the get-in, get-out whodunit.
Posted by: Aimee Hix | February 07, 2019 at 06:28 AM
Great post, Elaine. I always point to Gatsby, which is barely 47,000 words--what some people might terms a novella really and yet what's been championed so many times as THE Great American Novel. I've said with short stories that a story will find its right length (sometimes over a lot of drafts, a lot of cutting, a lot of mistakes) and I think that's true of a novel too. An arbitrary length may be useful for publishing but for craft.... maybe not always.
Posted by: Art Taylor | February 07, 2019 at 06:29 AM
You raise an interesting question, and while I wouldn't set an absolute limit to length, I do get impatient with unnecessary padding, repetition, and lengthy description. I have occasionally wished for a Reader's Digest condensed version of overly-wordy books, and there was one Harry Potter book (the fourth?) that could have used some pruning. (Yes, I said it ;-)
Some weighty tomes send me, despite my preference for "tree books," searching for ebook versions, for the sake of my hands. It the prose is lovely, I may overlook some extra length for the pure enjoyment of poetic descriptions, and if the action is quite compelling, I'll read non-stop.
Posted by: Storyteller Mary | February 07, 2019 at 09:29 AM
I think it is J.K. Rolling wannabes. Harry grew in pages at a pretty good clip.
But I don't buy the pound. Tell me a good story. There are some pretty powerful authors who can get it done around 200 pages.
Posted by: Alan P. | February 07, 2019 at 09:50 AM
I have read all of the Ian Fleming Bond books as well as several of the additional stories. No, other than the titles, very little Fleming is one the screen after the first three movies*. All of them are under 200 pages. One of his books is a collection of short stories.
* When Casino Royale came out there was a lot of talk about the violence and the story. The movie is about 90% true to the book. The big change. Baccarat is switched to Texas Hold'em.
Posted by: Alan P. | February 07, 2019 at 09:54 AM
You're spot on, Marcia. Most of the Golden Age writers published books in the 250-page range. A big change from today's novels. I like JK Rowling, but her mysteries could use a good trim.
Posted by: Elaine Viets | February 07, 2019 at 10:30 AM
Yep, I feel the same way, Aimee. The novel has to really grab me to keep me reading more than 350 pages.
Posted by: Elaine Viets | February 07, 2019 at 10:31 AM
I'd like to see the return of the novella, Art. Mark Twain said something like everything ever written is too long -- and he's right when it comes to the modern mystery.
Posted by: Elaine Viets | February 07, 2019 at 10:33 AM
A thoughtful commentary, Mary. I've fallen asleep over those weighty tomes when I read in bed -- a painful experience.
Posted by: Elaine Viets | February 07, 2019 at 11:13 AM
Love that books by the pound phrase, Alan. The Bond books turned out to be a pleasant surprise after the movies.
Posted by: Elaine Viets | February 07, 2019 at 11:14 AM
Addendum: When I was in grade school, the bookmobile limited the number of books we could check out, and in order to have enough to last, I would seek out bigger books. I've also been told that Russian novels are so long because Russian winters and train journeys were so long.
Posted by: Storyteller Mary | February 07, 2019 at 11:15 AM
Ah, yes, the bookmobile. It brought great excitement to our neighborhood in Florissant, Missouri. I loved the smell of the bookmobile and the librarians were so helpful.
Posted by: Elaine Viets | February 07, 2019 at 11:19 AM
An uncle of mine had a theory that you could tell when a writer moved from a typewriter to a computer by the increase in the length of their books. He was fond of using Asimov’s Foundation series as an example.
Posted by: Cath from Australia | February 07, 2019 at 03:30 PM
I like that theory, Cath, and I think it's true. The Golden Age writers either typed their own manuscripts on clunky typewriters or hired secretaries. I used to use those things. When I switched to a computer, writing was so much easier.
Posted by: Elaine Viets | February 08, 2019 at 06:03 AM
Asimov was one of the first to make use of computers for writing. In a PBS interview, he gave insights into how this new technology worked and said the biggest change for him was that he no longer tried to think of new words to avoid having to correct a typo.
Posted by: Storyteller Mary | February 08, 2019 at 07:22 AM